Anti-Eurocentric Eurocentrism?

The pitfalls of a 'shallow' approach to epistemological revision

Authors

  • Ben Brent University of Cambridge

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15664/mt1w6s49

Abstract

This essay by guest author Ben Brent investigates the subtle ways in which Eurocentrism can be reproduced in what otherwise appear to be anti-Eurocentric, decolonial theory. Distinguishing between “shallow” and “foundational” anti-Eurocentrism, the decentering approach pursued by some anti-Eurocentric authors is analysed in juxtaposition with the stronger position which forms the kernel of much decolonial theorising. A more “foundational” anti-Eurocentrism does, however, entail its own problems for global thought: namely, the reproduction and circulation of knowledge in a more pluriversal geopolitical context. Decoloniality is the only paradigm that offers a foundational break from Eurocentrism, opposed to a revisionism which rearticulates some of Eurocentrism’s core historical and ideological premises.

Author Biography

  • Ben Brent, University of Cambridge

    Ben Brent is a graduate of the University of Cambridge, with first-class honours in History and Politics. Twice published in the Cambridge Journal of Political Affairs, Ben was formerly Head of Policy and Deputy Director of The Wilberforce Society – the UK’s oldest and largest student-run policy institute. Throughout his three-year affiliation with the society, Ben wrote, edited and oversaw numerous paper publications on topics ranging from autocratic disinformation to asylum inequality.

Downloads

Published

2025-09-23

Issue

Section

Critical Conversations / Blog

How to Cite

Brent, B. (2025). Anti-Eurocentric Eurocentrism? The pitfalls of a ’shallow’ approach to epistemological revision. INTER- The Journal for Global Thought, 1(1), 138-152. https://doi.org/10.15664/mt1w6s49