China’s role in the Syrian conflict: a cautious quasi-mediator
Main Article Content
Abstract
This paper examines China’s mediation diplomacy in the Syrian conflict through the theoretical framework of quasi-mediation proposed by Degang Sun and Yahia Zoubir and relies on both Chinese and English primary and secondary sources. It is argued that China has conducted a limited intercession strategy in its quasi-mediation diplomacy due to its few national interests concerned by the conflict, limited leverage over the disputing parties, the low level of international consensus over the solution of the conflict, and the high intractability of the crisis settlement.
Article Details
Section
Articles
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).