Does the insanity plea allow the infringement of the public’s right to security or is taking away the plea an infringement of yours?
Main Article Content
Abstract
This paper will focus on an assessment of the plea ‘not guilty by reason of insanity.’ The
piece will seek to interrogate how the mentally ill are treated by the judicial system, whether
the NGRI plea is reasonable, and the ways in which the legislative system must adapt to
ensure that mental health is prioritised.
Article Details
Section
Articles
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).